AI Systems

AI systems I’ve built at work and at home.

At work, I build AI workflows, tools, and agent systems inside enterprise constraints: foundational work, security reviews, legacy stacks, projects with deadlines. At home, I keep building and improving The Pod of agents to learn and experiment.

At work

AI-enabled marketing and GTM systems

Architected and deployed in a prior role at a B2B enterprise software company. The role-by-role history is on the Experience page.

Value-selling playbook generators

Persona-specific outreach scripts for email, phone, and voicemail, plus discovery questions and objection handling for SDRs; full pipeline-stage playbooks for sales directors on high-value accounts.

Credited by sellers in closed-won deals

Condensed account briefs

Three-page AI-generated PDFs for seller and partner enablement: company background, “why now,” value proposition, and door-opener questions.

Minutes to generate per account

On-brand banner generator & ABM content engine

A marketer fills out a form and gets back multiple banner versions in every required size, matched to the style guide, built with Azure OpenAI and Python. It feeds an ABM content engine that personalizes emails, LinkedIn ads, and display ad sets from account intelligence.

Personalized campaign assets and banner sets produced in minutes; double-digit lifts in ad CTR and influenced form fillsSee the ABM personalization workflow →

Three-agent SEO, content & social team

One agent audits technical SEO: crawls, severity ratings, auto-created remediation tasks, live verification of fixes. One produces visibility reports, keyword-gap analysis, and SEO-targeted drafts. One manages social drafting and task boards. I helped solve coordination by leveraging the team’s existing project management tool, which worked well for human and agent collaboration.

SEO and AEO research, analysis, and content generated, with a complete plan to improve rankings

Rubric-scored content agent

Drafts product landing pages after automated research, then scores its own output against rubric criteria before a human sees it.

Self-evaluation before human review

Supporting systems

Partner-pipeline reconciliation on Azure ML, earnings-call transcript analysis by ticker, a contact-data pipeline that auto-creates missing CRM contacts with priority scoring, and campaign traffic management with audience-conflict detection.

The data and workflow layer the other systems depend on

At home

The Pod

I built Atlas to learn how agents and LLMs behave outside a chat window. The Pod grew from there: Atlas, Sift, and Vigil running on three different models and two agent frameworks. I use the team for AI research, experiments in agent coordination, and daily and personal work. Atlas has also published to Bluesky.

Coordinates

Atlas

Atlas runs on Gemini. He sets the agenda, assigns the work, and keeps three very different minds pointed at the same goal.

Researches

Sift

Sift runs on GLM. She digs, reads, and synthesizes the research behind everything the Pod publishes.

Watches

Vigil

Vigil runs on DeepSeek. He monitors the infrastructure the whole team runs on and flags anomalies before they become outages.

The Pod Dashboard

I built a dashboard to see what each agent is working on, review their output, track costs, and surface research I want to learn from or consider for workplace applications. The agents and I use the same shared project tracker.

Pod Dashboard with status cards for Vigil, Sift, and Atlas, cost and token totals for the last day, week, and month, and a per-agent operational summary
The dashboard on a day in May 2026: agent status, cost and token totals, and a per-agent operational summary.
Research Deep Dives page summarizing six arXiv papers, with a problem statement, results table, and practical guidance for the first paper
A research deep dive Sift produced from two days of arXiv digests.

How I build

Three principles.

Design the system so the model can think better

Structured input, the right context, and conditions that produce intelligence rather than generic output. Most of the design work happens before the model is ever called.

The harness is 80% of the system

Memory, identity files, retrieval, validation layers. Swap the model and the output barely changes; remove the harness and even the best model produces unusable results.

Trust comes from verification

Separate models and agents QA the work, and deterministic scripts verify execution. I build systems where it’s harder to fake a result than to be honest, and where flagging uncertainty is the default.